Extending Social Reasoning to Cope with Multiple Partner Coalitions
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a utility-driven rationality and a complementary-driven rationality based model, relative to multiple partner coalitions, motivated by relations of dependence and instrumental goal adoption. For this purpose, we analyze social dependency patterns and its corresponding dependency networks. The networks are used as a source of quantitative and qualitative information with which an agent is able to choose the best set of partners and adequate proposals to form coalitions. An e-commerce example is presented, showing the usefulness of the mechanism in real world multi-agent systems.
منابع مشابه
Extending Schema-Based Reasoning to Cope with Multiple Descriptions
Understanding natural language frequently requires determining co-reference of diierent descriptions of the same action or object. Schema-based reasoning is a well-established technology for natural language understanding ; existing systems, however, do not cope with this problem in a suuciently general way. In this paper, we propose to address this de-ciency by augmenting a schema-based rea-so...
متن کاملApplying the coalitionary-traits metric: sociality without cooperation in male yellow-bellied marmots
Mammalian sociality varies both within and between species. We developed a trait-based method to quantify sociality in a continuous way to study the adaptive utility and evolution of male social behavior. The metric is based on 3 key traits—mutual tolerance, collaboration, and partner preference; males with no traits are not social, whereas those with all 3 traits are described as forming coali...
متن کاملLogics of Interaction , Coalitions and Social Choice ( extended abstract )
While different forms of social interaction have been extensively studied in several fields, the development of formal logics makes precise knowledge representation and mechanical reasoning about situations involving social interaction possible. In particular, such logics make it possible to formally specify and verify software implementing social mechanisms. In my talk I will give an overview ...
متن کاملAn approach to argumentation-based reasoning under uncertainty
Argumentation is an important mechanism for nonmonotonic reasoning. Extending argumentation to permit reasoning about uncertainty would result in reasoners capable of operating in a wide variety of realistic domains. This paper describes one such formalism, which associates uncertainty with abstract argument, thereby allowing us to determine the level of uncertainty with respect to argument jus...
متن کاملA trait-based approach to understand the evolution of complex coalitions in male mammals
Coalitions occur when multiple individuals cooperate against a common opponent or for a common goal. Coalition formation is a complex behavior, typically described in highly social and cognitively complex species. Surprisingly, we know little about the social and environmental factors that may select for the evolution of coalitions. We studied the evolution of coalitionary behavior by first red...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999